Discover and collect
Gather recent candidate sources through scheduled feeds and controlled discovery methods.
Anonymized client case · Information monitoring
A public-sector research team needed to find, filter, summarize, and review relevant developments across a growing source landscape without giving up human control.
01
The existing process required advisors to search for sources, open documents, judge relevance, extract implications, summarize the material, and prepare it for a weekly briefing.
02 · Interactive workflow
Gather recent candidate sources through scheduled feeds and controlled discovery methods.
Read web pages and PDFs, reject unusable inputs, and verify source metadata.
Combine semantic and keyword relevance, then create concise evidence-linked summaries.
Present results in a dashboard where advisors approve, reject, edit, and prioritize.
03
Automated processing took approximately 24 seconds for known-relevant sources and about 68 seconds for borderline or irrelevant sources in the evaluation, compared with roughly one hour of manual work per signal.
Every valid source in the extraction test was processed successfully. The only unusable item was an invalid supplied URL. The improved relevance screen recognized every valid previously selected relevant source in its test group and produced no false positives on the clearly irrelevant test group.
04
These figures describe a proof-of-concept evaluation, not an autonomous production claim. The relevance test used previously selected examples, and the dashboard was deliberately designed for human approval, source checking, and correction.
Send your website and email. We send personalized questions within three working days and prepare the opportunity review after your answers.